Search for: "State v. Weight"
Results 161 - 180
of 7,977
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2007, 1:04 am
Nonetheless, the arresting officer made reference to the baggie during his testimony, and the court engaged in a colloquy as to the significance of the difference in the weights of the two baggies (intent to distribute as opposed to personal use). [read post]
1 May 2013, 2:14 pm
Matthew Kenwrick via flickrIn Moncrieffe v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:35 am
State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:50 am
Carl is admitted in the State of Delaware and regularly practices before the Delaware Court of Chancery, with an emphasis on shareholder disputes. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:49 am
State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:58 am
The Secretary of State disagreed. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
The Court placed very little weight on the international law materials relied upon. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 5:01 am
Geier v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:05 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:56 am
”); Carr v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:24 am
The correct approach is to follow the guidance which was stated to be “authoritative” in KO (Nigeria), namely the direction in the Upper Tribunal case of MK (Sierra Leone) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] INLR 563 (“MK”). [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:36 pm
On April 29, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:09 am
Manifest Weight Jackson challenged the credibility of C.H. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 7:50 am
A.A. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 9:14 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:14 am
This past Term's Lozman v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
Mr McGeough was not convicted of any offences in Germany, but was later extradited to the United States, where he pleaded guilty to moving weapons between states without a licence. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
The Court then explained: The United States Supreme Court, however, in Smith v. [read post]
