Search for: "State v. Worm" Results 161 - 180 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2020, 11:18 am by David Kris
Finally, Naksone writes that “[v]iolent extremist organizations have used the Internet to recruit terrorists, raise funds, direct violent attacks, and disseminate gruesome propaganda. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:18 am by Alasdair Henderson
Third, where the use of force by a State’s agents operating outside its territory bring an individual under the control of the State’s authorities, and thereby into its jurisdiction (the examples given here involve Issa v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 And asked that way, it’s clear this challenge opens up numerous cans of worms. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Jimmy Wales, the Wikipedia co-founder, has argued that an attempt by France to give an online privacy ruling global force is opening up a “disastrous can of worms” and could spur global censorship. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:19 pm by Corynne McSherry
The Office also suggests the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Lenz v Universal Music was mistaken. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 8:31 am by Robert Chesney
In some states capital charges are available in some circumstances. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On 16 and 17 March 2016, there was a two day hearing in Decoulos v Axel Springer Schweiz AG & ors On 11 March 2016 there was a judgement in the case of Monarch Airlines Ltd v Yaqub. [read post]