Search for: "Straw v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2016, 12:51 pm by Peter Margulies
The best indication of the joint dissent’s misunderstanding of the Framers’ scheme is its treatment of Justice Story’s landmark 1820 opinion in a piracy case, United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The defendants argued that the trial judge had taken a holistic approach to assessment of infringement and that the Court should instead apply an approach similar to the “abstraction-filtration-comparison” approach used to assess substantiality in the context of computer software infringement in the United States per Computer Associates International, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:08 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] It may just be me, but heretofore the Fifth Circuit was not known to be particularly amusing. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
  At the opening of this Term, it granted review of United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 6:55 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reversed a District Court's grant of summary judgment in an action alleging TIN Inc. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:36 am by Adam Wagner
In 1997, Strasbourg court was critical of UK interception law in the case of Halford v The United Kingdom (20605/92) [1997] ECHR 32. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am by INFORRM
In 1997, Strasbourg court was critical of UK interception law in the case of Halford v The United Kingdom (20605/92) [1997] ECHR 32. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am by Jim Lindgren
Railroad Commission—another unconstitutional conditions case—the Court declared: "It is inconceivable that guaranties embedded in the Constitution of the United States may thus be manipulated out of existence. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Hadley, 431 F.3d 484, 507 (6th Cir. 2005), and United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:59 am by Eric Segall
He rightly criticizes the post-1960's judicial fabrication of an injury-in-fact requirement, and he thinks the Court went wrong in the 1970's with cases like United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:06 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"  These are sometimes problematic terms that have required the attention of the United States Supreme Court in recent years, see Wall v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm by Mary Ann McNulty
She stated that fossil fuel companies want “to stir up a lot of controversy around your light bulbs, around your straws, and around your cheeseburgers. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm by John Floyd
”   The Open File list nine non-exhaustive types of misconduct:   Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence Introduction of false evidence Improper argument Discrimination in jury selection Interference with defendant’s right to representation Improper communications with a judge or juror Improper use of the media Failure to train subordinates and maintain a system of compliance Failure to report a violation of the rules of professional responsibility   Trial Courts and… [read post]