Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2023, 8:50 am
[The Sosa v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm
They won on this argument in the lower court.But last week, the Supreme Court, in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 4:01 pm
Time Warner (Catch-up Post) Court Says Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Pursue Failure-to-Purge Claim Under the VPPA – Sterk v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
Data Protection v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:31 am
The outcome isn’t novel—it reaches the same conclusion as the Airbnb v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
He begins by explaining what the litigation involves and what has happened:In February 2014, John Luna brought suit against Shac, LLC, dba Sapphire Gentlemen's Club, Club Texting, Inc. and CallFire, Inc. for violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (`TCPA’), 47 U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 6:58 am
The court summed up why a consumer alleging fraud in the marketing of a prescription drug shouldn't win: "The ultimate consumer is not in fact free to act on claims made in advertising. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 4:55 pm
Whistleblowers SOX Whistleblower Protection Shored Up With Retroactive Application of Dodd-Frank, BNA Securities Law Daily, July 11, 2011 Leshinsky v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 3:58 am
Suggestive trademarks are one rung up the protectability ladder. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 5:38 am
Chester v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
"For one thing, Waggoner responded, renting out a hotel room isn't a form of artistic expression or speech deserving of protection. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:51 am
Sevidal v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:33 pm
Whatever we think of the patent thicket idea generally, it doesn’t seem to have much bite in Apple v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm
Monday – the last day of the Court’s Term – is shaping up to be First Amendment Day at the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm
City of Chicago, 125 F.3d 1010, 1014 (7th Cir. 1997) (T-shirts “that the plaintiff sells carry an extensive written message of social advocacy” and “there is no question that the T-shirts are a medium of expression prima facie protected by the free-speech clause of the First Amendment and they do not lose their protection by being sold rather than given away. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:39 am
Apple consumer class action (that went all the way up to the Supreme Court) as well as Epic Games v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 4:40 pm
Give 'em up early. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:43 pm
Supreme Court in AT&T v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 2:19 am
For that relief, the trademark holder has an actionable claim under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 2:45 pm
Or we could consider them vulnerable and in need of protection, and those of us who can tell the difference will just have to accommodate them by giving up the non source identifying meaning to protect those who do see it as source identification. [read post]
