Search for: "Taylor v. I. N. S"
Results 161 - 180
of 389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
Taylor, 2022-NCCOA-910, ___ N.C. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:28 am
I, for one, can’t wait. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:28 am
I, for one, can’t wait. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am
This post talks about a list of about 120 books on the "black experience" that Judge Don Young ordered to be placed into the Marion, Ohio prison library back in 1972, Taylor v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
The other is that Texas v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 8:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
I. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:44 am
However the rule is substantially similar to the federal rule, and so here's the Ninth Circuit's take on the issue (from Taylor v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:10 am
Corp. v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 5:08 am
State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:13 am
See Taylor v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm
I certainly did not have a contract of employment, and to the best of my knowledge I still did not have one when I left the Clerk’s Department in 2006 – or, at any rate, I was never shown one or asked to sign one. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
” Dowling v. [read post]
