Search for: "The California Public Employees" Results 161 - 180 of 11,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2011, 6:06 am by HR Hero
The law, Public Chapter 646, is similar to a leave provision already in place for public employees and ensures up to 30 days of paid leave in a one-year period for organ donation. [read post]
Employee non-compete agreements (“non-competes”) are unenforceable in California, subject to a few exceptions. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:18 am by Ellen Savage, J.D.
Right of Publicity Laws Many states, including California, have so-called “right of publicity” laws that limit the way a person’s image can be used for commercial purposes. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:22 pm
On April 15, 2019, a California Court of Appeal affirmed summary judgment for the employer in an action alleging class-wide violations of the hyper-technical provisions of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).1  Following just shortly after the Ninth Circuit’s pro-employee opinion in a similar case, Gilberg v. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 8:01 am by Jacobs Paul
Effective Jan. 1.What it means: In a legal dispute between employee and employer, what happens in California has to stay in California. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:38 pm by Russ
Public employees (especially their contracts and pensions) are a huge part of the problem in California. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:00 pm by Tom Smith
Assembly Bill 946 would require the California Public Employee Retirement System and the California State Teachers Retirement System — the two largest public pension funds in the nation, with investments of $312 billion and $202 billion, respectively — to liquidate investments in any company involved with the wall’s construction within a year. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:09 pm by Rich
We doubt that a California judge would permit an employer to own an employee's superpowered dog novel. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 7:35 am by Jennifer L. Nutter
This is consistent with the historical approach taken by California courts in refusing to enforce such a restrictive covenant, based on the reasoning that California’s fundamental public policy interests outweigh the interests of another state. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:53 am
In addition to being more rational as a public-employee compensation policy, abandoning the California rule would also give governmental units in California, and wherever else the rule has been adopted, flexibility to deal with changing circumstances. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 9:55 am by Nassiri Law
There is no provision of the actual law that states this doesn’t apply to public sector employees – but that’s exactly what the California Fifth Appellate District found in the 2009 case of Johnson v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 6:39 pm by Seastrom Tuttle & Murphy
In California, where Silicon Valley firms often dish out equity to employees as a form of compensation, the net worth can skyrocket once a company gets sold or goes public. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:30 am
For employers in the public housekeeping industry, such as restaurant and hotel employers, what is the scope of their duty to provide meal breaks and rest breaks to their nonexempt employees? [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 9:06 pm by Anthony Zaller
California employers are cautioned to carefully review all agreements that restrict former employees’ ability to compete and solicit customers and employees to ensure the restrictions do not violate California’s strong public policy in allowing employees to perform their chosen profession or trade. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm by James Goodman
” Is the foregoing language an enforceable covenant or a violation of California public policy? [read post]
Businesses Cannot Coerce Their Employees Into Adopting Company Politics In this era of corporate activism, it is seemingly more common than ever for businesses to stake out public positions on hot button subjects. [read post]