Search for: "The United States Patent Office" Results 161 - 180 of 9,214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2024, 7:16 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Patent Office issued the following xxx patents to persons and businesses in Indiana in November 2023: PATENT NUMBER PATENT TITLE US 11826689 B2 Air filter arrangement; assembly; and, methods US 11830717 B2 Ion focusing US 11826832 B2 Passivation and alloying element retention in gas atomized powders US 11830716 B2 Mass spectrometry analysis of microorganisms in samples US 11828908 B2 Rack-mountable equipment with a high-heat-dissipation module, and… [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:14 am
Waterdrop also pointed to FRCP 45(a)(3), which states that an attorney may authorize and issue a subpoena if authorized to practice in the issuing court. 35 USC Section 24 states that "the clerk of any United States court for the district wherein testimony is to be taken for use in any contested case in the Patent and Trademark Office shall, upon the application of any party thereto, issue a subpoena for any witness residing or being… [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:01 am by Dennis Crouch
Vidal represented by Peter John Sawert, United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Hannah R. Albion
Protect Your Intellectual Property Brand owners should take necessary steps such as ensuring names or slogans associated with the leading product are registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
” In the United States applicants may use a terminal disclaimers to “obviate judicially created double patenting” by disclaiming any a portion of the term of a patent and confirming that the patent will be commonly owned with the second patent – see MPEP s1490. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:00 am by Jo Dale Carothers
For example, the original creator of the trade secret must have used it within the United States before the patent priority date. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:45 am by Tristan Marot
In December 2023, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom held that an AI cannot be an inventor under the UK Patents Act of 1977, and accordingly patents cannot be granted for inventions derived by AI. [read post]
When the United States Constitution was ratified in 1788, it included what’s now known as the Intellectual Property Clause, and for centuries the ostensible driver of patent law has been to foster innovation. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:00 am by Nathan Mannebach (US)
Recently, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) asked the Federal Circuit to reissue its opinion as precedential to “provide guidance and certainty to future applicants regarding the statutory basis for the failure-to-function refusal and its parameters, as well as the evidence relevant to that analysis” and to “reduce the probability of subsequent litigation over the same question. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 8:00 am by Nathan Mannebach (US)
Recently, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) asked the Federal Circuit to reissue its opinion as precedential to “provide guidance and certainty to future applicants regarding the statutory basis for the failure-to-function refusal and its parameters, as well as the evidence relevant to that analysis” and to “reduce the probability of subsequent litigation over the same question. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 4:15 am by Stephen McBride
As we enter 2024, major policy initiatives are pending at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and in Congress aimed at overhauling certain aspects of Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) practice. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 4:15 am by Stephen McBride
As we enter 2024, major policy initiatives are pending at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and in Congress aimed at overhauling certain aspects of Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) practice. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Bruce Hoffman
Indeed, the very history of federal law enforcement and justice in the United States should inspire optimism. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 6:06 am by Samuel Issacharoff
Leaving aside the interpretive debate on whether the President and Vice President are in fact “officers of the United States” as that term has been understood, the prohibition is an odd one outside of the obvious context of the Civil War. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm by Holly
A patent infringement action under Section 337 requires a complainant to prove that: (1) products are being imported into the United States that “infringe a valid and enforceable United States patent,”[9] and (2) “an industry in the United States, relating to the articles protected by the patent . . . exists or is in the process of being established. [read post]