Search for: "Thomas E Shields"
Results 161 - 180
of 194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
The Thomas More Law Center is challenging U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 11:06 am
Sir Thomas More was an Englishman who was executed in 1534 because he refused to swear an oath to King Henry VIII. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
GallagherDocket: 10-1032Issue(s): (1) Whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act; and, if so (2) what test should be used to analyze them.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (8th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition of respondents Thomas J. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am
”[39] In January 2012, rebel groups in Mali took control over part of the county, and by April, the regional capital of Timbuktu was taken over by the Ansar Dine, a Malian jihadist group and ally of Al Qaeda, where they established the local government, Hesbah.[40] As commander of the Hesbah, al-Mahdi destroyed ten buildings of a religious and historical character in Timbuktu, Mali, and was charged solely under Art. 8(2)(e)(iv) of the Rome Statute.[41] Al-Mahdi was the first… [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
We all know Justice Thomas’ answer – but he is an extremist on the issue. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
Privacy Shield should not act as a guide, experts have suggested. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
Florida: Thomas v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am
To quote Rumsfeld, the problem in those cases was "that the complaining speaker's own message was affected by the speech it was forced to accommodate": [B]ecause "every participating unit affects the message conveyed by the [parade's] private organizers," a law dictating that a particular group must be included in the parade "alter[s] the expressive content of th[e] parade. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 4:40 am
” David E. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
The liability environment for directors and officers is always in a state of change, but 2019 was a particularly eventful year in the D&O liability arena, with important consequences for the D&O insurance marketplace. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
The liability environment for directors and officers is always in a state of change, but 2019 was a particularly eventful year in the D&O liability arena, with important consequences for the D&O insurance marketplace. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
Like Roberts, many lawyers and judges rely heavily on this story to explain why the Constitution shields presidents from congressional limitations on their power. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
Prior to the start of the Michaelmas legal term on 1 October 2018 we have collated some of the most significant developments over the previous two months. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am
Similar to the law at issue in Hartwell, the relevant statute here applied to “[e]very officer of the United States. [read post]
20 May 2019, 10:55 am
Barr’s memo defines immunized conduct by contrasting it to “inherently wrongful, subversive acts” which “sabotag[e] a proceeding’s truth-finding function,” such as “suborn[ing] perjury, or induc[ing] a witness to change testimony. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
The court found that a sitting president’s personal information is not shielded from congressional investigation, but it also established a new, stricter test under which the legislature must convince courts that the material should be handed over to Congress. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
These types of contributions through anonymous LLCs have become increasingly common in recent years, as some wealthy political donors look to shield their contributions from the public by routing them through other entities first. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The clinic and its doctors are deemed federal employees under the Federally Supported Health Centers Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 233(g)-(n), and shielded from liability under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The clinic and its doctors are deemed federal employees under the Federally Supported Health Centers Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 233(g)-(n), and shielded from liability under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
