Search for: "Thomas Scientific Inc." Results 161 - 180 of 263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2016, 9:07 am by Schachtman
Fourth, what Hill said in 1965 must be viewed in the light of over 50 years of scientific developments in field of epidemiology and statistics. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Bayer Corp., 398 F.3d 640, 643 (7th Cir. 2005) (applying Illinois law); Thomas v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(IP finance)   United States US General Obama Administration asked for ‘balance’ in intellectual property appointments (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (EFF) (Law360) (Intellectual Property Watch) Identity of new USPTO Director may soon be revealed (IAM) The case against PACER: tearing down the courts’ paywall (Ars Technica)   US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Liner Grode Stein Yankelevitz Sunshine Regenstrief &… [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
The COVID virus is so new that the scientific research has not quantified the amount of viral load necessary to establish causal relationship.B. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:43 pm by Schachtman
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Nos. 16-11051, et al., 2018 U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:51 pm by Schachtman
Still, sometimes, trial counsel really do screw up, especially when it comes to technical, scientific, or statistical issues. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 10 and January 17 conferences) Arlene’s Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:14 am by Kendall Gray
Justice Thomas, writing for the majority applied the precedent to the plaintiffs' claim, which would not have even been scientifically recognizable when the statute was passed. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:17 am by Gene Quinn
As Thomas Edison even famously quipped, even a failure is successful at teaching what is now not possible. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:18 am
American Civil Liberties Union, 535 U.S. 564 (2002), the Supreme Court's opinion, which was written by Justice Thomas, held that the use of the Miller test did not by itself make a statute that prohibits disseminating obscenity to minors unconstitutional. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Their representatives also met with Carl Mayes – FSIS’s Assistant Administrator and FSIS Scientific Advisor Janell Kause. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
Boston Scientific, EIPR, vol. 20, No. 8, August 1998, pp. 132-134. [4] See for instance : Paris High Court, March 7, 2019, n° 17/14664, MSD v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am by admin
Cranor and Thomas Smith Martyn Thomas served as partisan paid expert witnesses in the notorious Milward case.[9] After the trial court excluded the proffered opinions of Cranor and Smith, plaintiff appealed, with the help of an amicus brief filed by The Council for Education and Research on Toxics (CERT). [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Norwood Realty, Inc., the letter of intent contained language that was explicitly binding.[46] The court held the letter of intent fell into the first category: Here, the intent of the parties to be bound by the letter of intent is not left to inference from the terms of their agreement but is twice expressly stated in prominent parts of the letter of intent. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am by Schachtman
Group, Inc., 639 F.3d 11 (1st Cir. 2011). [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am by Schachtman
Bell describes how he put the Allens in touch with Marcia Ratner, who sits on the Scientific Advisory Board of his Environmental Health Foundation. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 4:37 am by Rob Robinson
Year M&A+I Data Points Activity By Month (Q2 2021) April – 9 May – 6 June – 3 Activity By Month (Q2 2020) April – 0 May – 1 June – 3 Activity By Month (Q2 2019) April – 3 May – 2 June – 8 M&A+I Events (Running Listing: November 2001 – Today) eDiscovery Mergers, Acquisitions, and Investments Event DateAcquired (Investee)Acquirer (Investor)Amount (Estimated $) 25-Jun-25CS Disco - IPO (S-1 Filing with SEC)Exchange TBD$100,000,000… [read post]