Search for: "U.S. District Court Pros. Office" Results 161 - 180 of 1,755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2007, 9:15 pm
Rather, the district court must determine (1) whether the presiding officers of the House and Senate in fact signed the enrolled bill, thereby attesting to its passage, and (2) whether the enrolled bill rule requires dismissal of a particular claim as a matter of law. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm by Avery Schmitz
Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York is charging alleged perpetrators of transnational repression in two separate cases: United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 10:57 am by Howard Friedman
The court referred the case to the Pro Se Prisoner Settlement Program.In Jackson v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 2:20 pm by John Brannen
She previously served as assistant district attorney in the New York County District Attorney’s Office from 1979–1984. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 1:28 pm
Federal courts learned to keep operations going, despite restricted access to courth­ouses, with a quickly evolving reliance on technology and the resilience of a 30,000-strong workforce, according to the Annual Report of the Director, Administrative Office of the U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:13 am by WSLL
California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 9:48 am
District Court Judge for the Northern District of California since 2010. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:35 am by Florian Mueller
Large parts of the (U.S. and global) tech industry will breathe a sigh of relief now. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 3:28 pm by Mike
Buza could still seek help from the pro se legal office in pursuing his claims. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
We affirm the district court’s denial of relief on each of the issues properly raised on appeal. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
Affirmed district court summary judgment in discrimination case.EEOC v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am by Phil Dixon
The judgment of the district court was therefore unanimously affirmed. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Jordan, No. 07-5696 A conviction and sentence for mail fraud and aggravated identity theft is affirmed over claims that: 1) there was a Speedy Trial Act violation; 2) evidence was unlawfully seized from his vehicle incident to a warrantless arrest without probable cause; 3) the district court erred in refusing to appoint standby counsel to assist his pro se defense at trial; 4) the district court failed properly to exercise its discretion under Fed. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 12:27 pm by Jon Sands
Florida, 560 U.S. 631 (2010). [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:48 am by Mike
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
 But, several recent decisions by federal district courts in California ruled that the BJR applies only to independent directors, not officers. [read post]