Search for: "US v. Kevin Smith"
Results 161 - 180
of 329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2008, 12:06 am
George Mitchell called Kevin Ryan, the U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 11:42 am
This summary was prepared by Kevin F. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 7:23 am
The first of the pair is Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
We would like to thank Reed Smith’s Kevin Hara for helping to put this together.Daimler AG v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
Jones and Smith v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 12:18 am
I don’t think this works under Smith v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 11:23 am
Knotts rather than the numbers dialed in Smith v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:00 pm
See Katzenbach v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Because doing the job right would require research well beyond prescription medical products, we looked for research help, and enterprising (pun intended) Reed Smith associate Kevin Hara stepped up to handle the initial spadework. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Rev. 235 (2018) for sharing data with us. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Rev. 235 (2018) for sharing data with us. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
Kevin Marsh has an interesting post on the BBC College of Journalism blog entitled “A culture of contempt“. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 2:30 am
The EAT took the view that both were parties to a contract and thus mutually obliged to perform their obligations, with Lady Smith (at para 87) saying; “If a party to such a contract is in material breach of one of his obligations he cannot insist that the other party perform a reciprocal term” This isn’t new law – the same principle was set out in the 2008 case of RDF v Clements all the way back to Thorneloe v McDonald & Co in… [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Kilmer, Erika Jean Pribanic-Smith, Debra Reddin van Tuyll, Janice R. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:15 am
That bad, judge-created exception to the Fourth Amendment from the 1970s (Smith v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 5:36 pm
Supreme Court case of Reves v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:50 am
Here's another guest post by Reed Smith's own Kevin Hara, this time about a recent Texas case holding that health care providers involved in clinical trials are still protected by a state medical malpractice statute, and thus were fraudulently joined. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Smith reflected on the state of democracy and the rule of law in the Trump era. [read post]
