Search for: "US v. Rivera-Rivera" Results 161 - 180 of 558
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2014, 6:33 pm by Brian Shiffrin
” What prompted the Court’s review of Aguilar-Spinelli in the context of reasonable suspicion is the recent 5-4 Supreme Court decision in Navarette v California (__ US __, 134 SCt 1683 [2014]). [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:22 am
 And then there is the case of State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:58 am
Rivera ("This appeal arises out of the state’s use of consensually admitted evidence containing a hearsay statement that the defendant successfully had excluded when it was offered into evidence through testimony. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 8:12 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 11, 2009 US v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm by Daniela Alaattinoğlu
Moreover, the 50,000 US Dollars for damages is not that much more than the approximate 30,000 US Dollars that the Strasbourg Court has ordered the state to pay victims of involuntary sterilization (in 2011–12 cases V.C. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 164411, Aug. 27, 2018) and dismissed a Native American inmate's complaint that his request to construct and use a sweat lodge was denied.In Jones v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 3:24 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Sin embargo, luego usó su experiencia personal para hacer un llamado a la prudencia de la próxima persona que se integre al Tribunal Supremo. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:13 am by Unknown
A recent published appellate opinion addressed the sufficiency of a will to negate a right of survivorship for a joint brokerage account.Placencia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:13 am by Unknown
A recent published appellate opinion addressed the sufficiency of a will to negate a right of survivorship for a joint brokerage account.Placencia v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals also tells the district court what evidence to admit on remand.The case is Cameron v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:27 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Sin embargo, la jueza nunca se expresó directamente sobre derogar el precedente de Roe v. [read post]