Search for: "US v. Sullivan" Results 161 - 180 of 2,287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
Editor's Note: The following post comes to us from Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, and is based on a Sullivan & Cromwell publication by Brent J. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 11:17 am
Sullivan & Cromwell has filed a new Motion to Dismiss in the case of Charney v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:32 pm
As he passed us, he called out, "Go back to Washington! [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
The opinion of Gorsuch J for the US Supreme Court in 303 Creative LLC v Elenis 600 US (2023) (Opinion (pdf) | Justia) has been widely welcomed on the US political right as a victory religious rights and just as broadly deplored on the US political left as a defeat for LGBTQ+ rights. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Jackson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 5:50 am by Sheldon Toplitt
A New York federal judge's summary judgment ruling last week held that although phonographophiles may unload their LPs at yard sales, a company that served as an online marketplace for used digital music infringed on the copyright of a record company.United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Richard Sullivan's 19-page decision in Capitol Records LLC v. [read post]
A judge for the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found that Lawson was protected by the principles espoused in New York Times Co v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 11:05 am
It looks like there's going to be a status conference tomorrow in Sullivan & Cromwell v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:07 am by Dave
We reported on the interesting High Court decision in Babakandi v Westminster CC [2011] EWHC 1756 (Admin) (a post-Ahmad  challenge to Westminster’s housing allocation scheme) and made a few observations of our own on the judgment, most notably regarding the transparency of allocations schemes. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:07 am by Dave
We reported on the interesting High Court decision in Babakandi v Westminster CC [2011] EWHC 1756 (Admin) (a post-Ahmad  challenge to Westminster’s housing allocation scheme) and made a few observations of our own on the judgment, most notably regarding the transparency of allocations schemes. [read post]