Search for: "USA v. King" Results 161 - 180 of 390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2010, 6:33 am
"The plaintiff failed to allege any facts from which malice could be inferred and [her] conclusory allegations of malice were insufficient to overcome the privilege" (Red Cap Valet v Hotel Nikko [USA], 273 AD2d 289, 290; see Rohrlich v Consolidated Bus Tr., Inc., 15 AD3d at 562; Serratore v American Port Servs., 293 AD2d 464; Freidman v Ergin, 110 AD2d 620, affd 66 NY2d 645; see also Breytman v Olinville Realty, LLC, 54 AD3d 703, 704;… [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:18 am by Marissa Miller
Richard Wolf of USA Today summarizes the roughly three dozen amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
” Wednesday’s oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court ruled 5-4 in Lamps Plus Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:49 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: In USA Today, Richard Wolf looks at the Justices’ views on statutory interpretation and what they might mean for King v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:25 am
AMERICAN VETERINARY NURSES ASSOCIATION Geographically Descriptive of Veterinary Services, Says TTABTTAB Test: Is The Design/Stylization of This USA SUPPLEMENTS Mark Inherently Distinctive? [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing.Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises… [read post]