Search for: "United States of America v. Burden" Results 161 - 180 of 1,081
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Perhaps it is time to consider ignoring the United States Supreme Court when it unduly burdens and interferes with our democracy without first showing an "irreconcilable variance" between a law and clear constitutional text or largely undisputed history behind the text. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
”For a brief period in the 1960s and 1970s, courts rejected the “hands off” doctrine and used the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment as a justification to scrutinize and reform the conditions of confinement in America’s prisons.Pugh v Locke, decided in 1976, is one of the most famous examples of this approach. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
’’ Despite the choice of law provision, George Frank unilaterally added the following language at the end of paragraph 19: ‘‘Since this is a contract for an agreement taking place in the state of Connecticut, Connecticut laws will supersede those of California. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am by Bill Marler
Disease Burden from Viral Hepatitis A, B, and C in the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff Charles Slaughter alleges that the CON regime, including the moratoria, violates the equal protection and substantive due process clauses of the United States and Mississippi Constitutions. [read post]
It is unclear whether Mississippi will be entitled to equitable apportionment as the complaining state has a heavy burden of demonstrating that the other state’s water use is causing the complaining state significant injury. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
ITLA’s principles and mission are simple: to achieve and maintain high standards of professional ethics, competency and demeanor in the bench and bar; to uphold the Constitutions of the United States of America and the State of Illinois; to secure and protect the rights of those injured in their persons or civil rights; to defend trial by jury and the adversarial system of justice; to promote fair, prompt and efficient administration of justice; and to… [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:45 pm by Simon Lester
On October 31, the European Union and the United States agreed on temporary measures to settle their dispute over US Section 232 national security tariffs on EU steel and aluminium products. [read post]
A Sheppard Mullin trial team led by partners Brad Graveline and Laura Burson obtained one of the largest patent infringement damages awards against the United States of America for client SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc (SecurityPoint). [read post]
A Sheppard Mullin trial team led by partners Brad Graveline and Laura Burson obtained one of the largest patent infringement damages awards against the United States of America for client SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc (SecurityPoint). [read post]