Search for: "United States v. Cole" Results 161 - 180 of 568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Aliens from these six nations who have never entered the United States, have no relatives in the United States, and have never received any travel document from the United States. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 4:10 pm
Republic of Sudan, Az. 05-2003, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit examined the application of the terror exception in the context of the December 16, 2004 attack on the USS Cole in Yemen. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 3:30 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
  An accused's right to such constitutional notice of the charges extends to state prosecutions.In [Cole v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Inc. of Palo Alto, California, the United States of America, represented by Heller Ehrman LLP, the United States of America. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:59 pm by Art Hinshaw
The United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
The most high-profile grant was in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 11:56 pm by Matt Pavich
Case date: 01 April 2019 Case number: No. 18-3596 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: King Cole Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 10:24 am by Steve Vladeck
Nashiri has raised distinct challenges to the commission's authority over both of these episodes, arguing that the Cole bombing took place at a time when there was no armed conflict between the United States and al Qaeda, and that the attack on the M/V Limburg--a French-flag ship in the Gulf of Aden--cannot reasonably be connected to the (by then clearly established) non-international armed conflict between the United States and al Qaeda. [read post]
27 May 2014, 4:58 pm by Wells Bennett
Mark Martins, had this to say on the eve of a pre-trial motions hearing in United States v. [read post]