Search for: "United States v. General Research Laboratories"
Results 161 - 180
of 333
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
Two current actions in the United States serve as useful illustrations. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm
United States The New York Times had a piece “American Could Face Prison in Thailand After Posting Negative Reviews of a Resort”. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
United States, 137 U. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:16 pm
However, the areas covered by the review would be greatly reduced from (1) an evaluation of the technical accomplishments of the Program, including a review of whether the Program has achieved the goals under the metrics established by the Council; (2) a review of the Program’s management and coordination across agencies and disciplines; (3) a review of the funding levels at each agency for the Program’s activities and the ability of each agency to achieve the Program’s… [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:38 pm
The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:29 am
Ed. 2d 140 (1977); State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
“We continue to focus on transnational repression, where Chinese authorities have reached into the United States and other countries to repress people critical of Chinese policies. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm
United States, 268 U.S. 563, 566 (1925). [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
- ‘indirect consumer tax’ to fund UN public health initiatives (Afro-IP) Canada: Submissions on Canada-EU trade deal: Canadian Generic Pharma Assoc. wants IP out (Michael Geist) Canada: Intellectual property and agriculture – CDC Triffid seed story (ipblog.ca) EU: Records of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd expert meetings on SPCs (The SPC Blog) EU: Cooperation between Board of Appeal and National Court / acceleration of appeal proceedings: Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly… [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm
The MDMA has further stated that unless the tax is repealed, it will “stifle innovation, harm patient care, and weaken the position of the United States as the global leader in medical device innovation. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:47 pm
Wyeth Laboratories, 919 F.2d 397, 405 (6th Cir. 1990) (applying Ohio law); Brooks v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 12:38 pm
See, e.g., McClain v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
The international investment arena, with its myriad ad hoc tribunals and legal doctrines enshrined in treaties that either codify or build on customary international law, offers an excellent laboratory in which to theorize about communication between the nuclei and when such communication is appropriate. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:09 pm
Cancer Research sued Barr for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on July 20, 2007. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Abbott Laboratories, C.A. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
France The digital innovation laboratory, LINC, of France’s data protection authority, the Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés, has published a series of articles focused on the technical and legal risks associated with generative AI. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty)… [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:14 pm
Cir. 2006), and Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. [read post]
