Search for: "United States v. Job" Results 161 - 180 of 8,247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2015, 6:55 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
Onward Search, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey refused to dismiss most of Mr. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 11:09 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Herring v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 10:10 am by Daniel Hartzman
The H-1B visa allows United States companies to employ foreign workers in jobs that require at least a bachelor’s degree. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 10:10 am by Daniel Hartzman
The H-1B visa allows United States companies to employ foreign workers in jobs that require at least a bachelor’s degree. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:55 pm by James W. Ward
She investigated public corruption and human trafficking cases, oversaw the Gang Unit and served as head of the Gun Crimes Unit. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Reassignment of unit work to nonunit employees an improper practice under the Taylor LawMonroe County v New York State Pub. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
On June 1, President Trump spoke to governors and the public about deploying the military within the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 7:33 pm
The llinois' 1st Judicial District Appellate Court says that Illegal immigrants who are injured on the job are entitled to workers' compensation benefits even though they are not legally allowed to work in the United States. [read post]
Correctional Admin., 892 F.3d 53 (1st Cir. 2018) (“materially changes” employment conditions in a manner “more disruptive than a mere inconvenience or an alteration of job responsibilities”); Williams v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:36 am by Jeralyn
--United States v. $124,570, 873 F.2d 1240, 1246 (9th Cir. 1989). [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 9:38 am by Gene Quinn
On the very same day that the U.S. jobs report shows unexpectedly weak growth, the Federal Court of Australia issued a ruling directly opposite to the ruling rendered by the United States Supreme Court relative to gene patents. [read post]