Search for: "United States v. Marcus"
Results 161 - 180
of 394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
Mar. 31, 2015) (granting summary judgment); Carlsen v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:33 am
Contents include:David Lindsey, Military Strategy, Private Information, and War Isa Camyar & Bahar Ulupinar, War and the Sectoral Distribution of Wealth: Evidence from United States Firms Anup Phayal, Prabin B. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 5:53 pm
A decision by the full Commission could be further appealed to the Unites States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 3:57 am
Judge [Marcus D.] [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 1:13 pm
As reported in the Privacy & Information Security Law blog, the Seventh Circuit rejected Neiman Marcus’ petition for a rehearing en banc of Remijas v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:40 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 9:34 am
Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
In Marcus v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 11:59 am
Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Clapper v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 3:41 pm
See Marcus v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:18 pm
Grant v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:38 pm
One particular drug, an antidepressant manufactured by Forest Pharmaceuticals and commonly known as “Lexapro,” recently came under fire in the case of Marcus v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Bayer Corp., 727 F.3d 300 (3d Cir. 2013), and Marcus v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am
This suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito – all of whom voted to uphold the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
United States and concludes that “[t]he smart money is that the Court will take Justice Scalia’s suggestion and simply strike the residual clause, thereby leaving only the listed offenses. [read post]
