Search for: "United States v. McCoy"
Results 161 - 180
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Supreme Court in the District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
Ctr. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP) United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 6:12 am
(Delaware Supreme Court and Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, September 12, 2018 Tags: Campaign finance, Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 9:10 am
” The criteria for a document to qualify as a tax return are set out in the Beard test articulated by the United States Tax Court in 1984. [read post]
21 Oct 2023, 12:13 pm
United States, 326 U.S. 279, 283 (1945)). [read post]
18 May 2012, 4:49 am
See also United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:35 am
United States and last Term’s Bond v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:33 am
The appeals court, quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295 [2002], listed seven potential legal grounds to vacate a stipulation: fraud; collusion; mistake; duress; unconscionability; public policy; and ambiguity The Court ruled: Here, petitioner contends that the stipulated order should be vacated on grounds of fraud, unilateral mistake and unconscionability. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Bureau of Prisons, No. 06-9130 I"n a case involving the scope of 28 U.S.C. section 2680, which carves out certain exceptions to the United States' waiver of sovereign immunity for torts committed by federal employees, the Court rules that section 2680's broad phrase "any other law enforcement officer" covers all law enforcement officers, and not just law enforcement officers enforcing customs or excise laws. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
United States and Florida v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 4:27 am
United States, unpublished Sixth Circuit decision regarding prejudice under the Lafler and Frye decisions, that made it onto Doug Berman’s radar at Sentencing Law & Policy. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
A party will not be heard to complain, or attack its adversary, about failure to produce materials never requested.[13] Citing Rule 26(a) and its subsections, which deal with the report, and not discovery beyond the report, several cases take a narrow view of disclosure as embodied in the report requirement.[14] In one case, McCoy v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:18 am
., v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:05 am
, McCoy v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:47 am
Click to read the full court opinion State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Calk had hoped then-President Trump would name him to a powerful government post, including treasury secretary, defense secretary, or ambassador to France or the United Kingdom. [read post]
