Search for: "United States v. One Package" Results 161 - 180 of 1,681
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
Absent a specific request for coverage not already in a client's policy, or the existence of a special relationship with the client, an insurance agent or broker has no continuing duty to advise, guide or direct a client to obtain additional coverage (see Murphy v Kuhn, supra; JKT Construction v United States Liab. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 6:01 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
Many executives and other high-level employees receive stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs) and other forms of deferred compensation as part of their compensation packages. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
 This group includes individuals within the United States and many foreign countries. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:01 pm by Bona Law PC
And if you want a deep dive on the issue, you should read my friend Chris Sager’s outstanding book “United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:26 pm by John Floyd
On April 14, 2024, the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) unanimously voted to pass a package of federal sentencing reforms dealing with acquitted conduct and age considerations. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 1:59 pm by Gina Reif Ilardi and Molly Masenga
” even if it includes one or more articles, units, or parts from outside of the United States. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:22 am by SHG
And so begins its decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:45 am by Jeffrey Risman
Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court heard a case, United States v. [read post]