Search for: "United States v. Rivera"
Results 161 - 180
of 357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:02 am
United States, 487 U.S. 533, 537 (1988). [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:00 am
Torres Rivera para disponer de la interrogante. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 12:29 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:09 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:05 pm
(See Azar v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 10:41 am
United States, 396 U.S. 1, 7 (1962). [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:25 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Seized Account Funds Must Be Returned; Lis Pendens Against 'Substitute' Forfeitable Properties Vacated United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 8:56 am
But, following its own decision in Rivera, the court held that the new version of 1B1.10 does not apply retroactively.In United States v Murph, No. 10-1555-cr (2d Cir. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:30 pm
United States, 523 U.S. 614, 620-21 (1998) Modifica los elementos de la conducta delictiva por los que una persona fue convicto. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
Supreme Court on April 23, representing the United States in a criminal sentencing case. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/12/10/08-10436.pdf United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:22 am
Or, more accurately, yes, we could, but not after People v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Motion for Anonymous, Partially Sequestered Jury Granted in Prosecution of Alleged Mafia Members United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 1:50 pm
The judge held that the "combination of drugs" method: "resulted in arbitrary abrogation of a statutory and substantive right of a condemned person, in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Section 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution (due process clause)" See State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his… [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his… [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 pm
LaFave, Search and Seizure [3d Ed. 1996] § 3.5 [b], p. 259 n.46.); State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:41 am
Rejecting the notion that applying the general FLSA regulation for reimbursement of travel expenses on top of the specific H-2A rule would render the latter superfluous, the Ninth Circuit revived a claim for immigration and travel expenses brought by H-2A workers whose expenses in procuring employment and traveling to the United States dropped their pay below the minimum wage (Rivera Rivera v Peri & Sons Farms, Inc, November 13, 2013,… [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
United States, 17-6357, Rivera v. [read post]
