Search for: "United States v. Starks"
Results 161 - 180
of 822
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2020, 12:28 pm
The late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who often was in dissent in the court’s 5-4 decisions each term, once offered what seemed to be a message not just about the court but for all Americans when they believe the court is “out of whack” in whatever direction: Referring to her late husband, Ginsburg remarked, “Marty used to say the true symbol of the United States is not the bald eagle. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
”[xii] Effective Jan. 1 and July 15, 2020, Illinois and Kentucky, respectively, became the latest states to address smart contracts directly in legislation. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 11:33 am
The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm
Notably, the proposed rule states that the “integrated unit of production” factor differs “from the concept of the importance or centrality of the individual’s work to the potential employer’s business. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 5:43 pm
This past week the United States surpassed the grim milestone of 200,000 COVID-19 deaths and seven million cases of COVID-19. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 11:46 am
* * *In this case, the United States alleged that, from 2007 to 2020, under the direction and control of its prior management, R&V Associates Ltd. and Ronald Violi, Wheeling Hospital systematically violated the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute by knowingly and willfully paying improper compensation to referring physicians that was based on the volume or value of the physicians’ referrals or was above fair market value [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 4:21 am
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Taken together, they provide a stark recognition of the current global access to justice problem and a promising path for future reform. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:33 am
Stark v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm
” Section 201(a)(1) defines this category to include members of Congress, as well as “an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:49 am
De Simone v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 5:21 pm
Shirer won in State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:51 am
Although June Medical v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
”Once it was established that adults in the United States had the right to buy and use contraception, the attention shifted to access. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
United States, which discussed reasons for a less strict adherence to the court’s past decisions, as an example of a theory deserving of addition scholarly and legal scrutiny. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 2:40 pm
In March 2020, in Salzberg v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am
United States, 409 U.S. 322, 328 (1973). [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
That is the question that John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, examines in the following guest post. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:14 pm
She then looks to United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
To be sure, all United States persons, including citizens and taxpayers, have an interest in ensuring that the Executive complies with the law, and acts only when authorized to do so. [read post]
