Search for: "United States v. TIME-DC, INC." Results 161 - 180 of 272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion… [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Here is the 12/17/03 opinion in D & M Healthcare, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:25 am by Andrew Hamm
The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., and Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:08 am
See Crossroads Electric, Inc., 343 NLRB 1 [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am by Elizabeth McAuliffe (Bristows)
If the skilled person were in the United States, he would seek the assistance of a FAA DER who would be responsible for ensuring compliance with the relevant FAA regulations and guidelines. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(PatLit)   United States US General House approves USPTO funding bill (Managing Intellectual Property) US measures to strengthen trade enforcement (Intellectual Property Watch)   US Patents Peer-to-patent project set on hold. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
  The response explained the late filing of the answer by stating that, on the day the answer was due, Respondents' counsel was delayed in returning to his office from a hearing. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
On Thursday, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing on whether Rep. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:20 pm by James Kwong
Jordan of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
LEXIS 38 (Iowa May 7, 2010). http://tinyurl.com/22r6q4y Mainfreight United States Partnership v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am by Charlotte Garden
” The case turned on whether undocumented workers qualify as “employees” under the National Labor Relations Act, an issue that the Supreme Court answered affirmatively in 1984, in Sure-Tan, Inc. v. [read post]