Search for: "United Technologies Corp., in Re"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
The Foundation for a Christian Civilization, Inc., Opposition No. 91157073 [Opposition to registration of the apparel configuration depicted below as a mark for "clothing, namely ceremonial habit worn by distinguished religious representatives in certain ceremonies" and for "promoting public awareness of the need for healthy and religious families in the United States," on the grounds of lack of ownership, failure to function as a trademark, and likelihood of… [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Adelson chairs the Las Vegas Sands Corp., which owns a casino in Bethlehem. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 8:28 am
Fox Corp., No. 20-2-07428-4 SEA (Wash. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:20 pm
” SanDisk Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
Justice Anthony Kennedy had essentially invited a test case to overrule Quill Corp. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm
In re Kumar, 418 F.3d 1361, 1365 (Fed. [read post]
Supreme Court of the State of Delaware, Germaninvestments AG, v. Allomet Corp., Docket No. 291, 2019
4 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm
It manufactures high-performance, tough-coated metal powders using a proprietary technology for coating industrial products. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 5:18 am
” In re Authentidate Holding Corp. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
" In re IBP Confidential Bus. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
Collagen Corp., 63 Cal. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:15 pm
United Technologies Corp., 603 F.3d 1325 (Fed. [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:02 am
Authentidate Holding Corp., 369 Fed. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 3:23 pm
On June 29, 2015, the US Army Corps of Engineers and the EPA issued a final rule that amended the definition of “waters of the United States” for purposes of the Clean Water Act and made other amendments to the Corps’ and EPA’s regulations pertaining to other regulatory aspects of “waters of the United States,” such as defining “significant nexus. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
(Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: Independent consultant held jointly liable for infringement: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (PatLit) Can THE JOURNAL ever be distinctive for a journal? [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 9:28 am
And now, as tensions between the U.S. and Iran heat up, we’re seeing tech companies booting Iranians from their platforms left and right. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Unit School Dist. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am
Again, Qualcomm's self-delusionary opinion might have been that it could circumvent that obligation, but we're talking about a voluntary course of dealing. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:24 am
"We have the technology to do so much more," Kline said. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 2:26 pm
Inst. of Technology, 129 F.3d 681(1st Cir. 1997); Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. [read post]
