Search for: "V"
Results 161 - 180
of 491,707
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2010, 2:14 am
Regina v Irving; Regina v Squires Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Greater efforts were needed to ensure that correct information was available to sentencing judges so that proper effect could be given to the requirement to give credit for half of the number of any days spent by an offender on bail subject to a qualifying curfew condition and an electronic monitoring condition. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:31 am
Google Docs. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 2:52 am
R v Gore; R v Maher [2009] EWCA Crim 1424; [2009] WLR (D) 240 “The issue of a fixed penalty notice asserting one offence did not relieve the recipient of any possible further proceedings if and when it became apparent that a more serious offence had in fact been committed in the course of the same [...] [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:24 am
R v G; R v J [2009] UKHL 13; [2009] WLR (D) 80 “To rely on the defence in s 58(3) of the Terrorism Act 2000 a defendant had to show an objectively ‘reasonable excuse’ for his action or possession and a ruling that neither a desire to ‘wind up’ prison officers nor mental illness could [...] [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 3:17 am
Regina v Gore; Regina v Maher Court of Appeal “The issue of a fixed penalty notice asserting one offence did not protect the recipient from further proceedings if and when it became apparent that a more serious offence had in fact been committed in the course of the same incident. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 1:51 am
Regina v Erskine; Regina v Williams Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Firm measures were required immediately to ensure that appeals against conviction and sentence could be heard without an excessive citation of earlier, largely factual decisions which did no more than illustrate or restate a principle. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 2:18 am
R v JTB (on appeal from R v T) [2009] UKHL 20; [2009] WLR(D) 140 “S 34 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 abolished the defence as well as the presumption of doli incapax. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:37 am
This decision is the long awaited sequel to Manchester CC v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2010] 3 WLR 1441 (case comment here) where a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court held (in the context of demoted tenancies under the Housing Act 1996, Pt V, Ch 1A) that where a local authority bring possession proceedings relying [...] [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:41 am
The joint session of the Supreme Court and Privy Council heard the appeals in R v Jogee and Ruddock v The Queen (Jamaica) between the 27 and 29 October 2015. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 6:08 am
Do not use the V word please. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
Doe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:11 pm
CHARLES LEE HORNSTEIN V, Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:21 am
In Pereira v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:17 am
Patrick Gudridge (University of Miami - School of Law) has posted Moore v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:55 am
This decision was upheld by the Ontario Court of Appeal on April 26, 2011: Jagosky v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 4:44 pm
GikII V, Edinburgh 2009 http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/gikii/2010.asp GikII V, The Voyage Home28-29 June 2010John McIntyre Conference CentreEdinburgh Call for Papers expires April 15! [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 3:14 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Kahle v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 11:14 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Kahle v. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 11:20 am
The post Star v Ordinary Employees appeared first on Focus Law LA. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 11:14 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Kahle v. [read post]
