Search for: "Walker v. Attorney General" Results 161 - 180 of 597
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2011, 6:19 am by Nabiha Syed
Sebelius, in which Virginia’s attorney general, Ken Cuccinelli, has asked the Court to take up the issue of the constitutionality of the administration’s health-care legislation at once, without waiting for the federal courts of appeals to weigh in. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 7:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
The state of California, its governor, its attorney general, and other officials involved in the enforcement of state laws about marriage would definitely have “standing” to challenge Judge Walker’s decision in an appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:47 pm by Howard Friedman
 The city and county of San Francisco, California's governor and its attorney general all opposed a stay. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 12:32 pm by Cardone Law Firm
Generally, an employee’s conduct is within the course and scope of his employment if the conduct is the kind that he is employed to perform (Orgeron v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 12:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Thejury also found 3M to be liable for a Walker Process antitrustviolation and that attorney fees were an appropriateantitrust remedy. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:41 am by Broc Romanek
So did the Assistant Solicitor General who argued the case (although Elena Kagan, the newly appointed Solicitor General has broken from that tradition, as noted in this blog). 3. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  I have argued that Judge Walker’s judgment probably should be vacated (and language near the end of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Karcher v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:01 am by William Ford
Over the course of roughly 70 minutes, Judges Sri Srinivasan, Judith Rogers and Justin Walker peppered Charles Cooper, the counsel for House Republicans, and Douglas Letter, the general counsel of the House of Representatives, with questions. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law since he failed to show that the plaintiff was unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of her legal malpractice cause of action (see Mueller v Fruchter, 71 AD3d 650, 651; Velie v Ellis Law, P.C., 48 AD3d 674, 675; Pedro v Walker, 46 AD3d 789, 790; Eisenberger v Septimus, 44 AD3d 994, 995; Shopsin v Siben & Siben, 268 AD2d 578,… [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:12 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Miami attorney Jim Walker of Walker & O'Neill on his blog, Cruise Law News [read post]