Search for: "Washburn v. Washburn" Results 161 - 180 of 204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2009, 5:42 pm by Dennis Crouch
Examples of decisions on new function or result which are contained in my paper include the nineteenth century Supreme Court cases Winans v Denmead and Washburn & Moen Manufacturing, Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 5:42 pm
Examples of decisions on new function or result which are contained in my paper include the nineteenth century Supreme Court cases Winans v Denmead and Washburn & Moen Manufacturing, Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
& Ontario Paper Co., 261 U.S. 45, 60 (1923); Washburn & Moen Mfg. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:54 am by Ray Dowd
David joined Woodcock Washburn in 2005, where he litigates intellectual property cases.David was also lead counsel (pro bono) in the landmark case Nixon v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 12:42 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Lazare Kaplan, 628 F.3d at1374 (quoting Washburn & Moen Mfg. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:52 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Mossoff then cites several nineteenth century cases proclaiming goodwill to be property, such as, for instance, Washburn v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Teaching Information Privacy Law, Washburn Law Journal, Vol. 59, 2020 , Joseph A. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 8:00 am
SUN-TIMES, Jan. 24, 2007, available at http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/226452,CST-NWS-oly24.article. 16 Joravsky, Games Displace, supra note 4. 17 Id. 18 Id. 19 Kathy Bergen, Philip Hersh, and Gary Washburn, Changes In Plans For Chicago Olympics Bid, CHI. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am by Derek T. Muller
-Main 1.67 $97,238 $58,100 Yeshiva Univ. 1.68 $111,031 $66,000 Cleveland State Univ. 1.68 $83,868 $49,800 Washburn Univ. 1.68 $82,194 $48,800 Univ. of New Mexico-Main 1.69 $83,999 $49,600 Pace Univ. 1.69 $102,821 $60,700 Univ. of St Thomas 1.70 $84,261 $49,600 St John's Univ. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 2:33 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Ouellette (@PatentScholar) April 5, 2019David Olson (@PIEBCLaw): How can patentees use licenses to price discriminate under current exhaustion law post-Impression v. [read post]