Search for: "White v. State of Mississippi" Results 161 - 180 of 487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 5:52 pm
--Smith v Koch Foods of Mississippi,SDMiss: Employer's motion for summary judgement DENIED. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for the Mississippi Business Journal, Ben Williams names “the one Supreme Court opinion everyone should read”: Lucia v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
June 1, 2012) (applying Maryland law).Massachusetts:  Whiting v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:53 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Stay tuned over the next year as we share more stories about the current state of indigent defense, fifty years after Gideon v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for the Mississippi Business Journal, Ben Williams debunks “recent indistinct and misleading news reports” suggesting that “the Supreme Court of the United States has … asked the State of Mississippi or Governor to defend the battle emblem on the Mississippi flag. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:41 am by Zoe Tillman
The case has set the stage for the first big affirmative action battle since the Supreme Court's 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:45 pm
Claiborne Hardware, that the Constitution protected a 1960s boycott of white-owned businesses in Mississippi. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 2:03 pm by Dan
However, five states continued the practice: Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, and Virginia. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes looks at the case of a part-time municipal judge in Mississippi who has “asked the Supreme Court to intervene in what so far has been an unsuccessful federal lawsuit claiming the [Mississippi state] flag promotes white supremacy and violates the equal-protection rights of black Mississippians. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:15 pm by carie
” In the eight Southern states the study examined, more than 93 percent of the district attorneys are white. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:53 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Learmonth Oral Argument - Jackson, Mississippi lawyer Philip Thomas on the blog Mississippi Litigation Review and Commentary More Selective Statutory Interpretation By The United States Supreme Court - Philadelphia lawyer Max Kennerly of The Beasley Firm on his blog, Litigation & Trial How does a trial lawyer take a vacation - Seattle lawyer Karen Koehler on her blog, The Velvet Hammer [read post]
20 May 2010, 5:00 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Legal marketing specialist Tom Kane of Kane Consulting Inc. in his Legal Marketing Blog California v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 10:01 am
Explaining preemption, the ed board observes: “If a product has passed FDA scrutiny . . . tort lawyers in Mississippi or Delaware have less legal room to gin up their own case against the manufacturer using state liability laws. [read post]