Search for: "William T. Miller v. the United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 282
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
United States), parties can seek to reopen cases, etc. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Unlimited liability was never the norm for bank shareholders or executives in the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
” Famous cases in which the Court has held that speech was impermissibly compelled include: West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Department of Justice and was an assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
Dep’t. of Revenue, 384 Ill. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
Each post in this Year in Review series features a different federal courthouse in each state of the Union. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In Salazar v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Lopez-DeLeon, No. 06-41553 A sentence for illegal reentry is affirmed where defendant's prior California conviction for sexual intercourse with a minor qualified as a "crime of violence" within section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as documents established that the victim in that matter was under the age of 14. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1097 (8th Cir. 1973) (voiding as vague statute punishing "libelous, scurrilous, defamatory words" written on the outside of an envelope"). [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm
United States, which held that the federal government may not order state and local officials to enforce federal laws. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
United States in particular, these lower courts have reminded federal authorities that “[t]he Federal government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
See Miller v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
There have been three landmark cases issued by the Supreme Court during the last generation or two concerning the extent to which the presidency and the executive branch should be immune from legal and judicial processes and orders that would require disclosure of executive information and/or consumption of executive time: the famous Nixon Tapes case, United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
United States and Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
