Search for: "Wright v. Miller"
Results 161 - 180
of 427
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Last week, a class action lawsuit entitled Gary B. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
That case—G.G. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s announcement in New York Times v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
For example, a few years ago in Arlington v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:02 pm
In non-affirmative action cases like Washington v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Many commentators, including members of Congress and presidents, criticize judicial rulings as being influenced by improper philosophies or even by improper desires to protect partisan interests—think, for example, about the criticism of the conservative majorities in Bush v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I focus on one such case handed down in recent weeks, Harris v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
” Miller-El v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
” Miller-El v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:01 pm
House of Representatives v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:35 am
See Miller El v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:35 am
See Miller El v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
But last week the Ninth Circuit decided a case that shows how tricky government consideration of race can be, and how lower court judges sometimes make missteps in this complex area.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
He is a co-author, along with William Cohen and Jonathan Varat, of a major constitutional law casebook, and a co-author of several volumes of the Wright & Miller treatise on federal practice and procedure. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 10:08 am
Wright & Arthur R. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:17 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
’ Martin v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
Accord 14C Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 3726 at 275 (2009) (`Because Section 1442(a)(1) authorizes removal of the entire case even if only one of the controversies it raises involves a federal officer or agency, the section creates a species of statutorily-mandated supplemental subject-matter jurisdiction’).In a leading case on the scope and meaning of § 1442(a)(1), the Supreme Court in Mesa elucidated what the… [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 7:16 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
By now most Verdict readers have probably heard about Justice Scalia’s provocative comments at last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
