Search for: "Baker v. State" Results 1781 - 1800 of 3,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2017, 4:00 pm by Amy Howe
United States Monday, December 4 Christie v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Indeed, not dissimilar to Lord Mance’s emphasis on the Claimant’s family life in the Supreme Court case of PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd in the context of privacy claims, the judgment in AXB v BXA serves to illustrate that the Court will continue to place great emphasis when the Claimant’s family members, in particular spouses and young children, are also plainly adversely affected by both the Defendant’s course of conduct and the publicity that arises… [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
On both questions before the Court, these are the common issues: ** Will the Supreme Court feel bound by a one-line ruling it issued in 1972, in Baker v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:59 pm
At the end of 1999, the Vermont Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 11:07 am
State of Indiana , a 6-page opinion, Chief Judge Baker writes:Appellant-defendant Shaquita Gilbert appeals her conviction for Aggravated Battery,2 a class B felony. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 10:04 am by Scott T. Allen
” The OFCCP states that the directive is intended to update federal policy to incorporate recent developments in the law articulated in Supreme Court decisions, including Burwell v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court will decide whether the First Amendment bars Colorado from requiring a baker to create a cake for a same-sex wedding. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
State of Indiana , an 18-page opinion, Chief Judge baker writes:Appellant-defendant Mark J. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 2:08 pm by CJ Haddick
Finally, Justice Wecht wrote that the majority decision violated earlier state Supreme Court precedent in Erie Exchange v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON TAGNETICS, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 1:21 pm by MOTP
Howell, Judge Presiding.Affirmed.Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana.MEMORANDUM OPINIONGISELA D. [read post]