Search for: "Clarence T." Results 1781 - 1800 of 3,444
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2024, 1:56 pm by Michael C. Dorf
If it hadn't been this one, it would have been some other. [read post]
15 May 2025, 8:46 pm
Jimmy Hoover of the National Law Journal will later relate that there is another luminary in the box today — Laura Ingraham of Fox News, former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 4:38 am by Michael C. Dorf
Yet even trivial interests aren't necessarily illegitimate ones. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
" Whatever President Bush 1 said about his selection of Clarence Thomas, everyone knows that it was important to Bush to name a Black Justice to replace Justice Thurgood Marshall.Perhaps most glaringly, for some time it was common to speak of a "Jewish seat" on the Court. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 8:31 am
“Can you imagine telling 67,000 Republicans they can’t vote on the abortion initiative,” Mayes asked, her tone incredulous. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:20 pm by Sandy Levinson
Wouldn’t it have been sufficient to thank Trump for this expression of confidence and let it go at that? [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 1:41 pm by Daniel Bush
READ MORE: What we know — and don’t — about Neil Gorsuch’s judicial philosophy “In some of the dissents and concurrences, he showed he was pretty much in line with Justice [Clarence] Thomas’ thinking, in those cases,” Coyle told NewsHour. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 10:32 am by Derek T. Muller
(Others joined Judge Gregg’s opinion, didn’t participate, or didn’t weigh in.)Was Justice Gorsuch’s approach in Bostock right? [read post]
29 Apr 2025, 2:10 pm
Justice Sonia Sotomayor expressed concern that Martin and Cliatt were asking the justices “to answer a question we didn’t grant” review to decide. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
At National Review’s Bench Memos blog, Ed Whelan notes that “[t]his victory for the Little Sisters does not bring an end to the litigation. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” Jess Bravin reports for The Wall Street Journal that the “dramatic arguments … concluded with a rare question from Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:17 pm by Amy Howe
The justices didn’t act on the petition after that conference, nor after the 13 that followed. [read post]
16 May 2018, 12:30 pm by Ilya Somin
As Epps puts it, "the federal government can't order the states to dance to its tune; according to Murphy, it can't tell the states they may not decide not to dance to the federal tune either. [read post]