Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 7,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2012, 4:08 am
But these days, I can think of only one colleague who actually does that. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
The point is that the things that the book does deal with cannot be properly understood in isolation from x. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:54 am
Where does this leave us? [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:54 am
Where does this leave us? [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:22 am
I guess you always disclose it [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:15 am
Code § 2003(x). [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:50 pm
X-Posted: Concurring Opinions. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:53 am
E.g., does one draw the line at 100% credits? [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:55 pm
App’x 219 (4th Cir. 2012).I'm sure I've made many "fundamental mistake[s] of law" over the years--perhaps even in the past few days--but I'm fairly confident this ain't one of 'em. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:24 am
I don't. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 11:12 am
How does this analogy apply to cable TV? [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:01 am
Fourth, this complexity is yet another example of why, in Punting on Taxes, I reiterated the point I made in Tax Politics and Economic Uncertainty that playing politics with tax and economic policy is a dangerous game. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 12:39 pm
Now that I've hit the tax issue, I want to come back to Judge Carnes' dissent. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 12:39 pm
Now that I've hit the tax issue, I want to come back to Judge Carnes' dissent. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:26 pm
I'm also particularly pleased to see a ruling establishing that the Texas cap on noneconomic damages does not include household services. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
Employee X is a hot mess. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:09 am
While I understand the decision, a much better fit would’ve been CCH Pounder, who did a bang up job voicing the head of Task Force X in many DC animated productions. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 9:20 pm
In other words, the policy does not specify which persons an officer must search—for instance, by requiring that every person’s closed containers be searched—nor does the policy specify how intrusive any given search may be—for instance, by requiring that closed containers be examined only by x-ray as opposed to a visual search. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 1:24 pm
No, it does not. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:08 pm
I consdier it a lesser presumption since it comes from the Cal tax regs and not the Code (unlike the 9 month presumption). [read post]
