Search for: "Day v Davis"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 2,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
Davis, which involves the standards for government-funded investigations to establish an indigent defendant’s ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, and Wilson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:50 pm
IP Holdings v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm
Davis, 320 F.3d 1014, 1015 n.** (9th Cir. 2003); Alvarez-Machain v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:14 am
We also draw attention to the following decisions in other jurisdictions: Perry v McIntosh & Ors [2010] VSC 85 (24 March 2010) and Newnham v Davis (No 2) [2010] VSC 94 (1 April 2010) – two decisions of which deal with issues in pleading in a defamation case. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
” In Turner v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in in 1960 in Clay v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
Davis, 510 U.S. 1315, 1317 (1994) (Blackmun, J., in chambers) (citation omitted); Lugosch v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 8:24 pm
Davis opinion must be in place to be effective for the August 2008 payroll. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:11 am
In addition to losing approximately $300 million, Judge Leonard Davis also entered a permanent injunction that was to become effective 60 days from the judgment date, ordering Microsoft to cease selling the ubiquitous word processing program Word. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:11 am
In addition to losing approximately $300 million, Judge Leonard Davis also entered a permanent injunction that was to become effective 60 days from the judgment date, ordering Microsoft to cease selling the ubiquitous word processing program Word. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:59 am
In Duren v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
If they are, then the exception to those regs opened up by the ECJ in Teckal Srl v Commune di Viano applies. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm
If they are, then the exception to those regs opened up by the ECJ in Teckal Srl v Commune di Viano applies. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 4:37 pm
One of the reasons they agreed to let me go home and be cared for at home was because I was supposed to be working in that mental health ward the next day. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 am
In fact, there are only three: the Fourth Amendment violation at issue in Bivens itself, a sexual harassment claim against a member of Congress by one of his secretaries (Davis v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
