Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 1781 - 1800 of 36,746
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2023, 7:12 am by Chase Strangio
We have witnessed this court disregard and infringe people’s bodily autonomy repeatedly, most recently with its devastating decision in Dobbs, which overturned Roe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:29 am by Donald Dinnie
” Mtokonya v Minister of Police [2018] (2) SA 22 (CC) The claimants took occupation of the property in July 2013. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm by David Kopel
[Only one federal firearms prohibitor does not require any specfic finding of fact] On November 7, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the only Second Amendment merits case this term, United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:49 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
WHO has been pivotal in framing and operationalizing COVID-19 infodemic countermeasures through initiatives that monitor harmful information, and counter false information. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
  At the same time, irresponsible use could exacerbate societal harms such as fraud, discrimination, bias, and disinformation; displace and disempower workers; stifle competition; and pose risks to national security. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:09 am by centerforartlaw
”[13] Belinda claims that Hubert fraudulently altered a co-op stock certificate to falsely claim that he was the sole owner of an apartment jointly owned by the former spouses.[14] The court ruled in favor of Belinda, and she was declared to be the preliminary executor of her mother’s estate.[15] In that same year-2019-, Hubert began the eviction process.[16] Belinda received an order of protection against her father, accusing him of threatening the Donnellys with physical… [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am by David Pocklington
  The Chancellor was satisfied that the benefit of the changes would outweigh any harm to the church, and he granted a faculty. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Hay v Cresswell [2023] EWHC 882 (KB) and Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB) both centred on allegations, published online by the Defendants, that the Claimants had committed acts of sexual violence. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:11 am by Susan Haines
The Board Decision All the Board members agreed that Quickway’s decision to close the Louisville terminal was a partial business closure, and that even if that decision was based on union animus, the closure would only violate section 8(a)(3) of the Act if it was “motivated by a purpose to chill unionism in any of the remaining plants of the single employer and if the employer may reasonably have foreseen that such closing would likely have that effect” as set forth in Textile… [read post]