Search for: "IN RE ACCESS TO JUSTICE COMMISSION"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 2,191
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2011, 9:48 am
Here is what the relevant section says at (a): “Upon the filing of a formal statement of charges with the Commission by the special counsel, the statement and other documents later formally filed with the Commission must be made accessible to the public, and hearings must be open. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:16 am
Surprisingly, Elstein’s piece does not mention the free speech framework (section 12 HRA) introduced into the HRA at the behest of the former Chair of the Press Complaints Commission, Lord Wakeham. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:15 am
Will access to justice commissions find themselves in awkward positions given that different members may take opposing views of each others’ institutional positions and especially regarding funding choices? [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:00 pm
One of the major ways that I think the process has changed over time, and one significant way in which I think that we’re different from the Guantánamo review process, is that when you’re doing detention operations in theater, you have access to evidence that is simply not available when you’re separated both by distance and by time in the way that most of the Guantánamo detainees are. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
Other than putting a name on the reserve fund, the substitute language operates in practice just like current law, which has left the USPTO crippled through unpredictability and inability to access its user fees. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:44 am
Responses can be sent either by email: JUST-CRIMINAL-JUSTICE@ec.europa.eu; or post: European Commission, Directorate-General Justice, Unit B1 – Procedural Criminal Law, MO59 03/068, B-1049 Brussels, Belgium. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:15 pm
Prong 1 requires the courts to re-envision their procedures, and the roles of the judges, court-connected mediators to maximize the provision of meaningful access to justice. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
Does the reference to “substitute procedural safeguards” open a door for urging on courts (both through access to justice commissions and potentially litigation) the constitutional significance, as well as the underlying value, of courts reviewing their procedures and services to ensure that litigants are properly heard in all matters? [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:47 am
Our Response: This change will effectively bar small claimants from equal access to justice to determine compensation for their taking’s claims. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:08 am
” With Main Justice’s permission, the op-ed is re-printed here: There’s been a lot of chatter around Washington about federal antitrust regulators’ interest in investigating Google, including stories about an apparent tug of war between agencies. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:00 am
” With Main Justice’s permission, the op-ed is re-printed here: There’s been a lot of chatter around Washington about federal antitrust regulators’ interest in investigating Google, including stories about an apparent tug of war between agencies. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:13 am
True, we’re still expecting opinions in twenty-three cases, and some of them are likely to divide the Justices heatedly; that always happens towards the end of the Term, probably because the opinions take longer to write (as the Justices are likely trying to resolve their disagreements or writing separately). [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:33 am
Smith Law Clinic and Center for Social Justice at Loyola University New Orleans College of Law. [read post]
21 May 2011, 5:53 am
…Consistent with the principle of open justice and hearings taking place in public, we as a committee and I, as the head of civil justice and the Lord Chief Justice, if I can speak for him, as head of judiciary, are obviously anxious that hearings take place as much as possible in public. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:44 am
Second, they need to pass SB 122 to expand access to post-conviction DNA testing. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
5/9/2011 Guest: Michael Froomkin Free Expression International More Issues in Free Expression Photo by sheriffmitchell This post is part of "CDT Fellows Focus," a series that presents the views of notable experts on tech policy issues. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:35 am
Re-showing all the scenes and evidence while Costner is explaining it. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:35 am
If you don’t, they’re onto something else. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
The libel bills also fail on Article 6 which protects access to justice, Mullis argued. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:00 pm
. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ What does a property owner have to do in order to qualify as a "prevailing party" in a federal condemnation action, such that it triggers fee shifting under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA)? [read post]
