Search for: "In re Dennis" Results 1781 - 1800 of 2,445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2010, 8:20 am by Morris Turek
  Obviously, the International House of Pancakes has to protect its valuable intellectual property, but some lawsuits are just more hassle from a PR perspective than they’re worth. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:44 am
"Everybody's like, `You're going home,' " he said. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:49 pm
" 2) The MVS presages or reflects a re-opening of the divide between economic libertarians and social conservatives. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 7:01 am
It may be a rare case where someone might actually know you’re a dog on the Internet. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 8:25 am by Nikki Siesel
See In re Dennis Binkley, Serial No. 86429294 (May 30, 2017) [not precedential]. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 7:09 pm by admin
Everyone Loves You When You’re Dead, Neil Strauss 42. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:53 am by Tom Smith
Wait a few days until you're not in the middle of the worst snowstorm in 20 years. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 10:58 am
Shane Popp Article on Section 103 background [link] Mark Smith, a student at Santa Clara Law has these three posts in SCU’s great new Tech Law Forum: [www.techlawforum.net] [www.techlawforum.net] [www.techlawforum.net] The Patent at issue: [link] Cite as Dennis Crouch, “KSR Shifts Obviousness Debate to ‘Mere Aggregations,’ Patently-O, available at http://www.patentlyo.com. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:19 am
Vance Dennis, a Savannah Republican and member of the House Judiciary Committee, told members on Tuesday that he felt those charges should be re-examined before any action is taken on _____'s case. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:09 am by Patrick Maines
Seen this way (and even acknowledging that there is always some tension between the First Amendment and copyright, usually over arguments about the reach of “fair use”), both of these concepts are not just important in their own right, they’re the opposite sides of the same coin. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:47 am by Amy Howe
  Richard Re covered the oral argument for this blog, with other coverage coming from Kimberly Bennett of JURIST and commentary from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
BUT“If you’re looking for substantive conversation, you turn to blogs,” Ms. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:02 pm by Stu Ellis
  He also says when the desirable species of grasses have been consumed they have failed to re-grow in the drought and only the weedy species are left in a green state. [read post]
29 Nov 2005, 7:52 pm
" See In re Gardner, 475 F.2d 1389, 1391 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 3:00 pm
The claims of a patent define the invention. 35 USC 112 P 2; In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:11 pm by Carmen Dellutri
I am sure most of you heard the horror story involving Dennis and Kimberly Quaid's newborn twins. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 1:47 pm by [email protected]
He was re-indicted on the charge last year and could face the death penalty. [read post]