Search for: "Insurance Provider 2" Results 1781 - 1800 of 25,910
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2017, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Further it was concluded that allegations in an underlying complaint that the additional insured has control of operations and is liable for the actions of its agents, provided a sufficient basis to impose a defense obligation on an insurer providing vicarious liability coverage for the additional insured. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
The Policy provided (emphasis added): “If any person under a contract of service or apprenticeship with the Insured shall sustain a bodily injury or disease caused during any period of insurance and arising out of and in the course of his employment by the Insured in the business above mentioned, the Company will indemnify the Insured against all sums for which the Insured shall be liable in respect of any claim for damages for such injury… [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 3:42 pm
Connected travel insurance ("CTI") is travel insurance sold alongside a holiday or other related travel. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:26 am by Evangelina Cantu
The rule implements Section 3221 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, requiring HHS to align certain aspects of Part 2 with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH). [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:50 am
It is your actions, regardless of the insurance provider, that may land you in an upstate prison cell for perpetrating Insurance Fraud. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 12:58 am
In Templeton Insurance Ltd v Motorcare Warranties Ltd [2010] EWHC 3113 (Comm) the Commercial Court heard a dispute between Templeton, an insurance company incorporated in the Isle of Man, engaged in the business of selling mechanical breakdown insurance (MBI), and its UK agent, Motorcare.The principal-agent relationship between Templeton and Motorcare was governed by four annual slip policies from 2004 to 2008. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 6:44 am
Zachem ("The defendants...appeal from the trial court’s declaratory judgment holding that the plaintiff...has no duty to provide coverage under an insurance policy with the defendants for a claimed loss arising from an explosion and fire. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 6:04 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The compensation rate for PTD is 66-2/3% of the claimant’s average weekly wage (AWW) (440.14) payable bi-weekly until age 75. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 6:04 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
The compensation rate for PTD is 66-2/3% of the claimant’s average weekly wage (AWW) (440.14) payable bi-weekly until age 75. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:25 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   The policy also provides employment practices liability (EPL) insurance. [read post]
22 May 2023, 8:12 am by Latosha M. Ellis and Janine A. Hanrahan
Mave sued Lloyd’s in the Southern District of New York, and Lloyd’s moved for summary judgment on three grounds: (1) Mave failed to provide evidence that the loss occurred during the policy period; (2) Mave failed to provide timely notice of the loss; and (3) Mave failed to rebut Lloyd’s expert testimony that the damage was caused by ordinary wear-and-tear. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:18 am
§ 215.555(2)(c), for a portion of their catastrophic hurricane related losses. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:01 pm by Jon L. Gelman
The workers’ compensation insurance company, who provided coverage to an employer where a double fatality occurred when a grain elevator exploded, has been order by a US Federal Court Judge, to comply with a subpoena issued by The Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA] directed to obtain information about the safety of the facility. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 6:02 am
This is Part 2 of an ongoing series designed to provide California corporations general information on how to maintain their corporate standing. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 9:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that Lawyer was the Firm’s employee and assessed it for additional unemployment insurance contributions as a result. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that Lawyer was the Firm’s employee and assessed it for additional unemployment insurance contributions as a result. [read post]