Search for: "Jacob Rule"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 3,167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2010, 8:03 pm
Immigration law is quicksand for civil rights, so it's conceivable to me (recall that I'm not an immigration lawyer) that the no-lawyer rule is supported by some law or precedent, although I still think it's not in keeping with our traditions or aspirations for the rule of law. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:44 am
The Court of Appeals (Jacobs and Hall) holds that the plaintiff cannot proceed with his procedural due process case arising from his employment dispute with the Town. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 1:58 pm
A year without MICPEL – by Danny Jacobs Allan J. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:24 am
This approach focused the discussion, encouraging participants to identify the specific rules of law and procedure that would likely govern the treatment of similar facts in their home jurisdiction.This, in turn, encouraged participants to consider not only formal differences between the two jurisdictions (such as, for example, the classification of directors’ duties, or the treatment of contractual arrangements to exclude liability for breach of duty) but also to consider the extent… [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 9:41 am
District Court, a federal judge has ruled. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:33 am
The same rule also applies to UK patents under section 76 of the Patents Act 1977 (implemented in a "cack-handed way", according to Jacob LJ here). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:46 am
Following the decisions of the CJEU in Abraxis and Santen, it has been clear that the ruling in Neurim which first permitted SPCs for second medical uses is no longer good law in the EU. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 10:59 am
CVRA unambiguously rules out money damages. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:49 am
The status quo cannot be improved simply by reforming Chinese jurisdiction rules in choice of court agreements. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
But Jacob Sullum has a good column pointing out the limits of the new policy. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:16 am
And at Truthdig, Bill Blum considers the significance of the Court’s ruling, along with its decision in Wood v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 5:35 am
That doesn't mean they win the case, and they don't.For very technical reasons that only a First Amendment lawyer can love, the Court of Appeals (Sack, Jacobs and Hall) decides that plaintiffs are limited to an as-applied challenge to Operation Stinking Badges. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:51 am
The Federal Register is "[t]he official daily publication for rules, proposed rules, and notices of Federal agencies and organizations, as well as executive orders and other presidential documents. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
Supreme Court ruled in 2002 in Atkins v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 11:24 am
District Judge Gladys Kessler ruled that she lacked jurisdiction to stop the force-feeding of Guantanamo detainees. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 1:16 pm
Rules administered by the MLB and NCAA do not help the overall landscape of baseball talent across the country and should be altered. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 6:39 pm
" Speaking with Hammerle this afternoon about the ad, he said he's brought the ad to the attention of the Disciplinary Commission, citing Rules 8.3(a) and 8.4(d) of the Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
Jacob Lewis, the Seventh Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling that an arbitration agreement requiring employees to waive the right to participate in a class proceeding was invalid and unenforceable under the NLRA. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
Jacob Lewis, the Seventh Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling that an arbitration agreement requiring employees to waive the right to participate in a class proceeding was invalid and unenforceable under the NLRA. [read post]
25 May 2015, 5:02 am
Burningham, 165 P.3d 1214 (Utah Supreme Court 2007).Westmont also challenges the trial court's denial of its rule 59 and rule 60(b) motions and the trial judge's failure to recuse himself before ruling on Westmont's post-trial motions. [read post]
