Search for: "Kennedy Thomas" Results 1781 - 1800 of 4,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2014, 10:33 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Justices Scalia and Thomas stated that the question here, as in every case in which neutral state action is said to deny equal protection on account of race, is whether the challenged action reflects a racially discriminatory purpose. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:01 am by Tom Webley
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority – which included Justices Alito, Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy – in holding that section 4 was unconstitutional. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:31 pm by The Federalist Society
Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sotomayor joined as to Parts I and II. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 2:39 pm by The Federalist Society
Justice Alito’s majority opinion was joined in full by the Chief Justice and Justices Kennedy and Thomas, and as to Parts I, II, and III by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, and Kagan. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 9:01 am by David Bernstein
His other two appointments—Kennedy and O’Connor—were not originalists. [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Kennedy, of Harvard Law School; and Michael K. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:29 am
., and KENNEDY, THOMAS, BREYER, and ALITO, JJ., joined. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 9:49 pm
 The majority opinion (Alito, Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas) held that the St. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 3:10 pm
Meanwhile, in the dissenting opinion, Chief Justice Rehnquest (joined by Justices Scalia and Thomas) frets about advancing technology and "the right to be free from surreptitious eavesdropping" (which, they say, isn't going to be deterred if it's possible to "anonymously launder the interception through a third party and thereby avoid detection"). [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-27 (2018).Chloë Kennedy, Defences: Justification, Excuse and Provocation. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 10:12 am by Michael Fox
One wild guess would be that Justice Kennedy was undecided on that issue, and so this was a way for the Court to punt, until he makes up his mind.In the 5th Circuit, it does undermine the validity of  Sandoz v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:20 am by Orin Kerr
The four remaining Justices dissented (Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Thomas Jackson, University of North Carolina at Greensboro and Virginia Foundation for the HumanitiesKent Germany, University of South CarolinaModerator: Claudrena Harold, University of Virginia Department of HistoryCold War Civil Rights and Human RightsScholars have recently explored from many angles the intersection of domestic and international politics and policies during the civil rights revolution. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 12:15 pm by Lee Davis
In a curious alliance, Justice Sotomayor had the backing of Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg and Kagan. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Writing for the 5-3 majority (Roberts, Thomas and Alito dissent), Justice Kennedy notes that "This case lies at the intersection of the Court’s decisions endorsing the no-impeachment rule and its decisions seeking to eliminate racial bias in the jury system. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 11:39 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
To give just a few examples, it included: Asa Hutchinson (a former Arkansas Congressman who served in President Bush's administration), David Irvine (a retired Army brigadier general who taught interrogation and military law for 18 years), Claudia Kennedy (the first woman to achieve the rank of three-star general in the Army), Thomas Pickering (a retired ambassador with a diplomatic career spanning five decades), and William Sessions (the former director of the FBI under Presidents… [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
On October 25, the Claremont Institute and Federalist Society will present The Jurisprudence of Clarence Thomas: 25 Years on the Court, in Kennedy Caucus Room (Room 325), Russell Senate Office Building, US Senate.CFP: The Newberry Center for Renaissance Studies has a Call out for its 2017 Multidisciplinary Graduate Student Conference, which will showcase work on medieval, Renaissance, and early modern studies of Europe, the Americas, and the Mediterranean world. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm by Emily Prifogle
This week the Washington Post reviewed the book.Similarly, last week we noted several reviews of For Discrimination: Race, Affirmative Action, and the Law (Pantheon) by Randall Kennedy. [read post]