Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 55,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2021, 5:52 am
Most commonly, the concurring Justice signals disagreement with, or limitations they would place upon, the majority’s reasoning. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 1:10 pm
The motion to intervene explains that these free speech advocates and their organizations have been censored and de-platformed by major social media platforms that are working with — and taking orders from — the federal government. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:54 am
” People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 10:47 am
In Lopez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
The case is Lawson v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 2:30 am
The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants’ appeal by a majority of 5-2 against an alleged delayed response to a threat to life call which should have required an immediate response. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
Barrie v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 3:02 am
Inter alia, the Supreme Court held, by a majority, that the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, s 67(8) did not “oust” the supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court to quash a decision of the IPT for error of law. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:19 am
On appeal from: [2014] EWHC 889 (Admin) By a majority, the Court held that a District Judge in extradition proceedings did not have the power to admit the evidence in a closed material hearing (without disclosing it to the State requesting extradition); the judge also had no power to order disclosure to the CPS on the condition that further disclosure to the Rwandan Government was prohibited; lastly, the judge had no power make a witness anonymity order under the Coroners and Justice Act… [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:57 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 8:49 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 9:01 am
<> Center for Sustainable Economy v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:29 am
The CAFC case Takeda v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 1:22 pm
Sometimes you write a majority opinion and try to be pretty moderate. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:32 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is A.A. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 8:40 am
Here is the majority: 856613.opn And the dissent: 856613.no1 And links to all the briefs: 85661-3 – Automotive United Trades Organization v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 8:01 am
Majority panel suggests expert testimony should be permitted on retrial of charge for using the Internet to solicit sexual activity with a minor, in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 10:05 pm
Lawyers expect major benefits from the settlement of a suit against the satellite-radio service, though class members won’t be getting cash [Blessing v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:37 pm
Sherrod, 26 M.J. 30, 33 (C.M.A. 1988)).The majority then applied the test from Liljeberg v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 am
On appeal from: [2015] EWCA Civ 1257 The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by a majority of 3:2 concerning whether the Court of Appeal erred in law in its construction of the terms of enhanced capital notes (ECN) by relying on technical and specialist information as part of the factual matrix. [read post]
