Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2016, 10:06 pm
The Denman case takes a sharp turn away from those decisions by treating an operating agreement the same as corporate bylaws. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:51 pm
Though the case, Davis v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:32 pm
The opinion in Kwasniewski v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 pm
| US trade secrets | Trends in IP Data | EPO's new Chief Economist | GIFs and copyright | Katcall for new positions in the IPKat team | Star Wars IP.Never too late 83 [week ending on Sunday 31 January] – The AmeriKat from the Silicon Valley | INGRES conference on developments in European IP law 2015 - patents | Economics of UK creative industries |Stretchline v H&M | Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme | Ethics… [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:26 pm
In a section of the opinion that stands out from the rest for its somewhat-sharp rhetoric, Judge Orenstein offers somewhat fiery rhetoric describing the government’s proposed use of the All Writs Act as a bid for “crypto-legislative authority” (“crypto”…I see what you did there!) [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 5:01 am
Sleet in Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 5:01 am
Sleet in Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 12:11 pm
But if not (and if the plaintiff is a public figure and the article is on a matter of public concern), then the Supreme Court’s decision in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 7:29 am
In the recent case of Foster-Naser v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Accordingly, said the court, this case was governed by the rule of New York Times Co. v Sullivan, 376 US 254, in which the Supreme Court of the United States interpreted the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as embodying "the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm
” In the same way, Justice Louis Brandeis wrote in his dissent in Olmstead v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:51 pm
Though the case, Davis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
* English Patent Court speeds up, reminds Mr Justice Carr in Celltrion v BiogenCelltrion Inc. v Biogen Idec Inc., F. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:12 am
Maybe we need to balance incentives for marginal artists v. incentives for most popular, instead of incentives v. access. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
But Scalia’s rejoinder (not so different from his repeated, inelegant advice to Bush v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 11:26 am
Mary’s Honor Center v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:55 am
The issue in that case was whether the Court should overrule its decision given in a case 50 years ago (Brulotte v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
Never too late 81 [week ending on Sunday 17 January] – Talented IP barristers 2015 | Wright Hassall LLP v Horton Jr & Anor [2015] EWHC 3716 (QB) | Economics of Collective Management Organisations | International jurisdiction in online EU trade mark infringement cases | SUEPO officials fired, downgraded | Electromagnetic Geoservices v Petroleum Geoservices [2016] EWHC 27 | Accord Healthcare Limited v. medac… [read post]
