Search for: "Shields v. United States"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 2,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
United States), for federal agents, and to 1961 (Mapp v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:08 am
The Supreme Court has made clear in Community Communications Co., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 12:47 am
Supreme Court (SC) in Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
The case of a ten-year-old girl raped and impregnated in Ohio was the focus of not just exhaustive coverage and outrage in the media, but the condemnation of the President of the United States. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
The United States’ Stolen Valor Act criminalized lies about the receipt of a military decoration. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm
United States Kanye West’s music video for “Famous” has sparked outrage for portraying naked celebrities in bed, in the form of life-like wax figures, and IPKat has looked at whether those portrayed can use publicity rights. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 1:12 pm
Just last year Justice Alito reminded us “that the autonomy of religious groups, both here in the United States and abroad, has often served as a shield against oppressive civil laws. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
Crown Cork & Seal, in 2010, in which Willett concurred in a decision striking down a statute that shielded a company from successor liability in a tort case. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[24] The court continued by observing that: [H]ere, the Provision is used by an agency of the federal government to shield itself from public view. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
PIRATES OF THE CARRIBEAN AND THE TEST OF SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITYThe United States District Court for the Central District of California went on to rule that Walt Disney’s “Pirates of the Caribbean” had not lifted copyrighted elements from the screenplay of the same name. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 10:19 am
United States makes clear, the fact that non-privileged information was communicated to an attorney may be privileged, even if the underlying information remains unprotected. 449 U.S. 383 (1981). [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 5:04 am
United KingdomMeechan v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:25 pm
” In the beeper case, United States v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am
There are strong grounds for immediate action now to shield their faces. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 8:27 am
. *** In EEOC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:30 pm
As the Court put it in Lear, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
The Hunton & Williams blog discusses the final version of the EU-US privacy shield. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
From Doe 1 v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 2:17 pm
In light of those immunity doctrines and the unique structural role and constitutional status of the President of the United States, the Court concluded that Nixon was “entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 9:26 am
These distinctions just scratch the surface and add to the complexity of the emerging patchwork of data privacy and security law in the United States. [read post]
