Search for: "Shields v. United States"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 2,124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Now that the elder law bar has seen several copies of the MassHealth Essay, it is clear why the Office of Medicaid has shielded the MassHealth Essay from public release. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Now that the elder law bar has seen several copies of the MassHealth Essay, it is clear why the Office of Medicaid has shielded the MassHealth Essay from public release. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
In Tatel v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
O’Malley (Judge, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, USA) explained that currently, there were three avenues to challenge patents in the United States – through the District Courts up to the CAFC, through the International Trade Commission, and through the USPTO Patent and Trademark Appeal Boards (PTAB) to the CAFC. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 2:27 pm
Bad Faith: ATTORNEY'S ADVICE SHIELDS INSURER FROM BAD-FAITH FINDING, Finger v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 1:51 pm
,United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:29 am
The worst offender in this regard is American political science, both in the sense of the sub-field that studies the United States and the scholarship and institutions (i.e. political science departments, associations, journals) of the country. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The European Parliament has issued a non-binding resolution to the EU Commission to suspend the EU-US privacy shield. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 10:10 am
In Itzkovitch v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Reyno, a wrongful death action was brought in United States federal courts on behalf of the Scottish victims of an air crash against the American manufacturer in United States federal court.[14] In the Piper decision, the Court seems to have attempted to moderate its approach to forum non conveniens with an acknowledgement that there is nothing in the ruling which compels courts to ignore the possibility of an unfavorable change in law. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
Reyno, a wrongful death action was brought in United States federal courts on behalf of the Scottish victims of an air crash against the American manufacturer in United States federal court.[14] In the Piper decision, the Court seems to have attempted to moderate its approach to forum non conveniens with an acknowledgement that there is nothing in the ruling which compels courts to ignore the possibility of an unfavorable change in law. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
The author analyses the background of the decision and discusses its consequences for the long-standing conflict of procedural laws ( Justizkonflikt) between the United States and Germany. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SU6 United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 12:00 pm
The purpose of the cat’s paw rule, as the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has stated, is to provide that “an employer cannot shield itself from liability for unlawful termination by using a purportedly independent person or committee as the decision maker where the decision maker merely serves as the conduit, vehicle, or rubber stamp by which another achieves his or her unlawful design. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 12:00 pm
The purpose of the cat’s paw rule, as the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has stated, is to provide that “an employer cannot shield itself from liability for unlawful termination by using a purportedly independent person or committee as the decision maker where the decision maker merely serves as the conduit, vehicle, or rubber stamp by which another achieves his or her unlawful design. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:16 am
Under United States Supreme Court precedent, it is relatively easy to sue police officers who commit misconduct, but federal law still provides enormous protections to prosecutors. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
