Search for: "State v. Alexander" Results 1781 - 1800 of 2,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
Alexander Bobikin and Alexander Ivanov, who listened to the verdict standing in a reinforced glass box at the Kotelevska district court in central Ukraine, both pleaded ‘guilty’ last week. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 10:30 pm by Sophie Dukarm
The answer – according to settled case law – is that the term ‘Member States’ refers to ‘government authorities of the Member States’ (see, for example, Région wallonne v Commission (para. 6.)). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Betty Lupinacci
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Importantly, today’s ruling does not impact NanoString’s legal ability to market or sell CosMx SMI products for protein detection in the European Union, nor does it impact the lawful selling of any NanoString CosMx SMI products in the United States, the United Kingdom or the rest of the world outside of the EU member states participating in the UPC system. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:27 pm by Jamie Baker
Professor Loewy’s article Statutory Rape in a Post Lawrence v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm by Audrey A Millemann
  In that case, Strumlauf v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm by Adam White
Alexander Hamilton argument for “energy in the executive” is famous, but even those who read Federalist 70 often miss his deeper point. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Nevada: The United States District Court for the District of Nevada held in Switch Communications Group v. [read post]