Search for: "State v. Branch"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 6,968
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2019, 8:22 am
In any case, following the success of Baker v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 1:57 pm
I have argued that the immunity grant appears constitutionally valid, at least as to a challenge under United States v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 1:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 2:58 am
Further, and contrary to GSP’s contention, the second counterclaim adequately states a cause of action for professional malpractice (see CPLR 3211[a][7]; see generally Nonnon v City of New York, 9 NY3d 825, 827). [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 1:47 pm
The heart of the Article is a historical review of executive branch decisionmaking with respect to the five major military conflicts the United States has fought. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 4:59 am
The heart of the Article is a historical review of executive branch decisionmaking with respect to the five major military conflicts the United States has fought. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:00 am
The first intervening case was the Court's 2020 decision in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 7:09 am
See, e.g., Bush v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 8:31 pm
The Court in Carter v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:04 am
In an order entered March 2, 2017, the Supreme Court, among other things, denied those branches of the plaintiff’s motion which were for summary judgment on the cause of action to recover on an account stated and pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaim. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:09 am
” The decision notes that “Even stray remarks in the workplace by persons who are not involved in the pertinent decision-making process may suffice to present a prima facie case [of unlawful discrimination], provided those remarks evidence invidious discrimination.In consideration of this, the Appellate Division modified Supreme Court’s order, on the law, by deleting the Supreme Court's provision granting that branch of the employer’s motion “which was for… [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:12 am
” Kirsten draws the poignant parallel to the infamous 1944 Supreme Court decision in Korematsu v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm
Justices of the Supreme Court rarely give public comments on words or actions of members of the elected branches of the federal government. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 9:46 am
Adams v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:30 am
Clearly, that is a job for the law- and policy-making branch of government. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:00 am
"**The Court of Appeals decision notes that "New York's public policy strongly disfavors the receipt of state pensions by persons also receiving state salaries, citing §150 of the Civil Service Law as establishing New York State's general public policy against the simultaneous receipt of a state pension and a state salary. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 5:12 am
To use an example, did the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 4:51 pm
In Re: National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation (Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
Baker v. [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 12:31 pm
And Cooper v. [read post]
