Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 1781 - 1800 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2023, 7:33 am
Moreover, there is no evidence that any United States marks come as close to VOGUE as Applicant’s EVOGUE mark. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:06 am by Eric Goldman
VIP therefore was entitled to judgment in its favor on the federal and state law dilution claims. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:00 am by Barry Eagar
Jockey International Inc v Darren Wilkinson [2010] ATMO 22Jockey is the registered owner of a number of trade marks relating to underwear featuring JOCKEY as a component. [read post]