Search for: "State v. Means" Results 1781 - 1800 of 61,198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 10:58 am by Beck, et al.
That means the cases against the manufacturers aren’t very likely to succeed under Riegel v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
  Indeed, the Court held that in the event of ambiguity, the interpretive "canon" of California State Bd. of Equalization v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
  Indeed, the Court held that in the event of ambiguity, the interpretive "canon" of California State Bd. of Equalization v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
But that means standing doctrine is not based on Article III. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:10 am by Jessica Arons
The threat to abortion rights has by no means passed and the work isn’t over. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
State Senate required to provide employee payroll records in response to a Freedom of Information Law requestMatter of Polokoff-Zakarin v Boggess, 2009 NY Slip Op 03823, decided on May 14, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPenny Polokoff-Zakarin filed a Freedom of Information [FOIL] request seeking documents concerning an employee of the State Senate, including the individual's date of employment and date of termination of employment, the title or position of… [read post]
13 May 2009, 12:09 am
Lets see if that means easy blogging for yours truly: State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:23 pm by Lawrence Solum
It tells the story of Santa Fe Independent School District v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
On Monday, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Fox v. [read post]