Search for: "State v. Taylor"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 3,053
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
R v Reeves Taylor, heard 24-25 Jun 2019. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
Birgit steps into the debate that that these filings have triggered, focusing on what Taylor’s obsessive filing entails in terms of freedom of expression.* Jurisdiction in online Community trade mark infringement cases: what's the story? [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
Taylor, 2019 Cal. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 6:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
In this post, Jeremy allows occasional guest blogger Paul England (Taylor Wessing LLP) to report on the appeal decision of this case, rendered by the Court of Appeal for England and Wales.* Is This Henley a Shirt or a Musician? [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:00 pm
See Savage v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
But we have travelled some distance since Fry J's restrictive probanda were uttered (Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Ltd [1982] 1 QB 133, of course, being the most pertinent authority, but others are cited), and Patten LJ said that the court was able "to take a flexible and very fact-specific approach to each case in which estoppel by acquiescence is relied upon" (at [39]). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
But we have travelled some distance since Fry J's restrictive probanda were uttered (Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Ltd [1982] 1 QB 133, of course, being the most pertinent authority, but others are cited), and Patten LJ said that the court was able "to take a flexible and very fact-specific approach to each case in which estoppel by acquiescence is relied upon" (at [39]). [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm
§ 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(1) (emphasis added); see also Taylor Made Software, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
The United States appeals Joseph Hairston's 60- month sentence, which was re-imposed by the district court on remand in light of United States v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
IPSO 18075-23 Singh v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18301-23 Taylor v The Herald on Sunday, 1 Accuracy 2021, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 19677-23 A complainant v The Daily Telegraph, 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19741-23 Dikme v eveningnews24.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction:… [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:36 am
Montana’s Original Sin By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore Garrett Epps writes about Espinoza v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
Toomey, citing School District 6 v NYSHRB, 35 NY2d 371, said that such a personnel policy, even if the product of negotiations under [the Taylor Law] would violate the State’s Human Rights Law and is therefore a prohibited subject of negotiations.* See Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:45 am
Rodriguez prevented from accessing assistance to end her life, while Gloria Taylor, also suffering from Lou Gehrig’s disease and the main plaintiff in Carter v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:36 am
Forthcoming Appeals A number of data protection cases will be the subject of appeal hearings in 2018: TLT v Secretary of State for the Home Department – hearing 11 or 12 April 2018 Stunt v Associated Newspapers – hearing on 19 or 20 June 2018. [read post]
