Search for: "Stock v. Stock"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 8,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2013, 6:57 pm
During his employment, Quinlan received stock pursuant to his employee compensation plan. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
Both Williams' stock and ETE's common units trade on the NYSE. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
In Robb v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 8:52 am
With the exception of the Eleventh Circuit, the petitioner says, every circuit to address the issue has concluded that a corporation's insider status gives rise to a duty to disclose (Fried v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 7:44 pm
As I've discussed elsewhere, a 2005 decision of the Indiana Court of Appeals, Brant v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 6:31 pm
Whitfield, III Family LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:06 am
The court ultimately concluded that the disappointing sales numbers and resulting stock price drop were more plausibly related to customer reaction to the company's public relations issues than its accounting practices (Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 9:35 am
When a company is delisted, its stock can no longer trade on the Nasdaq exchange; however, the stock may trade in the over-the-counter bulletin board or the pink sheets. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:30 am
One common technique is stock dilution. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 10:34 am
Harzewski v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 11:06 am
The judge concludes with quotes from Berger v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:20 am
Al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:08 am
For another, it resonated with a recent Delaware Chancery Court decision in a dissenting shareholder case called Huff Fund Investment Partnership v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:22 pm
In Cockhren v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
From the rudimentary partnerships of early civilizations to the sophisticated joint-stock corporations of the 17th century, the evolution of business organizations reflects the changing landscapes of human civilization. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 11:17 am
In Steginsky v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 3:49 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 9 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Cramaso LLP v Ogilvie-Grant, Earl of Seafield & Ors [2014] UKSC 9 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
Corp. v Meit, 224 AD2d 191, 192 [1996]; Cafferty v Thompson, 223 AD2d 99, 102 [1996]). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm
That is the outcome of the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. [read post]
